Dr.Ramanand Thakur v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.21883 of 2011 =========================================================== Dr.Ramanand Thakur S/o Late Hardeo Thakur Resident of Kalptaru, Mohalla B.B. Ganj, Police Station Sadar, Town and District- Muzaffarpur. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Health, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
2. Principal Secretary, Department of Finance, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
3. Director, Provident Fund, Department of Finance, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
4. District Provident Fund Officer, Darbhanga, Laheria Sarai, Darbhanga.
5. The State of Jharkhand through the Principal Secretary Department of Finance, Govt. of Jharkhand, Ranhci.
6. District Treasury Officer, Dhanbad, Jharkhand.
7. District Provident Fund Officer, Dhanbad, Jharkhand. .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.
For the Respondent/s : Mr.
=========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 09-12-2015 Nobody appears on behalf of the petitioner.
Learned counsel for the State of Bihar and State of Jharkhand are present. They have also filed their counter affidavits.
From the counter affidavits filed, it appears that all due payment of G.P.F. by the State of Bihar has been made and for the period 1992-93, which the petitioner claims from the State of Jharkhand, the statement in the counter affidavit is that he had not drawn any salary and thus there was no question of any deductions to be made. Copies of the counter affidavits have been served on learned counsel for the petitioner in the year 2012-
Patna High Court CWJC No.21883 of 2011 dt.09-12-2015 2/2
14. However, no rejoinder has been filed to the same. In view of the aforesaid position, the Court can only presume that the grievance of the petitioner has either been redressed or he does not want to pursue the matter. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed off. (Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.) P. Kumar U T