Bhim Bali Nut v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.66230 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-832 Year-2020 Thana- MADHAURAH District- Saran ====================================================== Bhim Bali Nut Son of Dinesh Nut R/o Village- Bazit Bhoraha, P.S.- Marhowrah, District- Saran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sanjay Kumar Jha For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms.Sangeeta Sharma ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 23-09-2024 1.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 45 of the Bihar Excise Act and Sections 147, 149, 341, 323, 337, 307, 353, 504 and 506 of the I.P.C.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has antecedent of two cases and the informant alleges that police had gone to arrest the accused persons of Marhowrah P.S. Case No. 829 of 2020 but the accused persons along with other accused persons started throwing stones on the police party and they assaulted police party with lathi, danda on account of which police sustained injury and they also misbehaved with the police. 4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was not arrested from the spot as such nothing was

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.66230 of 2024(2) dt.23-09-2024 2/2 recovered from his conscious possession and the allegation of assault is general and omnibus in nature.

5.

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

6.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Marhowrah P.S. Case No. 832 of 2020, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. 7.

It is made clear that the learned trial court before accepting the bail bonds of the petitioner shall verify the criminal antecedents of the petitioner and in the event if it is found that the petitioner has antecedent of more than two cases, in that event, the present anticipatory bail order shall not be given effect to. (Satyavrat Verma, J) SUMIT/- U T