Rahul Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.55800 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-109 Year-2019 Thana- GOPALPUR District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== RAHUL YADAV Son of Fulo Yadav @ Phul Kumar Yadav Resident of Village - Bhawanipur, P.S.- Gopalpur (Rangra), Distt - Bhagalpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rajesh Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Lalan Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 27-11-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is in custody since 20.04.2019 in connection with Gopalpur (Rangra) P.S. Case No. 109/2019 for the alleged offences under Sections 427, 436, 504, 506, 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in connection with setting fire to the informant's phus hut. It is submitted that after due investigation the police has submitted final form finding the allegations to be false. The petitioner has already suffered more than seven months in custody, who claims clean antecedents.

4. Learned APP appears and has been heard and has not pointed to any adverse material in the case diary against the petitioner.

5. Be that as it may, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM III, Naugachia, District Bhagalpur in

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.55800 of 2019(3) dt.27-11-2019 2/2 connection with Gopalpur (Rangra) P.S. Case No. 109/2019 on the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

(iii) That the petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail. (iv) The petitioner shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned. (Vikash Jain, J) Chandran/- U T