Shibu Singh @ Taxi Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.19468 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -153 Year- 2014 Thana -BHORE District- GOPALGANJ ====================================================== Shibu Singh @ Taxi Singh, son of Anil Singh, Resident of Village- Bhorey, Police Station- Bhorey, District- Gopalganj.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ghulam Rabbani For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. J.N.Thakur(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 05-05-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

The petitioner is an accused in connection with Bhorey P.S. Case No. 153 of 2014, registered under Sections 392 of Indian Penal Code, pending in the Court of Sri Ashish Mishra, Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Gopalganj.

The accusation is that on 16.08.2014 at about 7.30 P.M., the informant being the proprietor of M/s. Bhore Service Station was present at his patrol pump. In the meantime, two persons boarded on a motorcycle came and on the point of pistol took the key of the cash counter from Lalbabu Singh and looted Rs. 1,50,000/- from the cash counter. When informant rushed there then he saw petitioner and one Vivek Singh, who succeeded in fleeing away.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.19468 of 2016 (2) dt.05-05-2016 2/2 in this case. Further submission is that nothing incriminating has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. The petitioner is in custody since 14.01.2016.

Learned counsel for the State vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner and submits that there is direct allegation against the petitioner, who committed robbery at the patrol pump of the informant.

Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and nature of allegation, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, prayer of the petitioner, above named, is rejected.

(Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) manish/- U T