Sudhir Mehta @ Sudheer Mehta And ORS. v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.58360 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -46 Year- 2015 Thana -MALI District- AURANGABAD ======================================================
1. Sudhir Mehta @ Sudheer Mehta S/o Ramjee Mahto
2. Pankaj Mehta, S/o Surendra Mehta
3. Mithun Kushwaha @ Mithun Kshuwaha, S/o Ramjee Mahto. All are residents of village- Simri Dhamni, P.S. Mali, District - Aurangabad.
.... .... Petitioners
Versus
The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ram Shankar Das (Spl.P.P) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE RAVI RANJAN ORAL ORDER 25-01-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the Special A.P.P.
The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 504 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3 (i) (x) of SC/ST Act. It is contended that the petitioners have falsely implicated in this case due to dispute of keeping cattle on a vacant land situated in between the house of the petitioners and the informant. It is highly improbable that the petitioners will call upon the informant and take him besides the river and, thereafter, assault and insult him. It is further contended that it is nowhere stated in the FIR that the assault or insult was in a public view. It is further
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.58360 of 2015 (2) dt.25-01-2016 2/2 contended that there is no injury.
Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioners, namely, Sudhir Mehta @ Sudheer Mehta, Pankaj Mehta and Mithun Kushwaha @ Mithun Kshuwaha be released on bail in the event of their arrest/surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks from today in connection with Mali P.S. Case No.46/2015, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000 (Ten Thousand Rupees) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad subject to the conditions as laid down under sub-section (2) of Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
(Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J) V.K. Pandey/- U T