Sumant Kumar Singh @ Sumant Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.56777 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-95 Year-2019 Thana- MAGADH MEDICAL COLLEGE District- Gaya ====================================================== 1.

SUMANT KUMAR SINGH @ SUMANT KUMAR Son of Ajit Singh @ Ajit Kumar Singh Resident of Village - Chapardah, P.S.- Madgadh Medical, Dist.- Gaya.

2.

Ajit Kumar Singh @ Ajit Singh @ Ajit Kumar Son of Late Bhagvat Singh Resident of Village - Chapardah, P.S.- Madgadh Medical, Dist.- Gaya. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sumeet Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Abhay Kumar Roy ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 06-09-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest for the offences alleged under Sections 341, 323, 504, 506, 384, 379 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code registered in connection with Magadh Medical P.S. Case No. 95/2019.

3. It is submitted that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the backdrop of land dispute and the parties are agnates. It is submitted that the ingredients of Section 384 of the Indian Penal Code are not attracted as no amount is paid to the petitioners. The petitioners claim clean antecedents.

4. Be that as it may, in the event of the petitioners' arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks from the date of communication of this order, let the above named petitioners' be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM IV, Gaya in connection with Magadh Medical P.S. Case No.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.56777 of 2019(2) dt.06-09-2019 2/2 95/2019, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C. and also subject to the following further conditions: i. That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioners. ii. That the petitioners shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

iii. That the petitioners shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make themselves available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

iv. The petitioners shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, their bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned. (Vikash Jain, J) Chandran/- U T