← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./58612/2022allowed

Anil Mahto v. The State Of Bihar

2023-02-02Mr. Justice Sunil Kumar Panwar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.58612 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-344 Year-2021 Thana- RIGA District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== Anil Mahto Son Of Chalitar Mahto R/O Village- Kharsan, Ward No.09, P.S.- Riga, District- Sitamarhi ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Madhubala Verma For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Braj Kishore Pd.(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 02-02-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 363, 366(A), 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Prosecution case relates to abduction of minor daughter of the informant, allegedly, aged about 16 years, by the petitioner along with other co-accused persons. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has falsely been implicated in this case. A statement has been made in para-3 of the petition that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. As per the impugned order, the victim girl was recovered and she has not supported the prosecution case in her

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.58612 of 2022(2) dt.02-02-2023 2/2 statement recorded under section 164 of Cr.P.C. but she was minor at the time of occurrence. It is further submitted that the compromise has been prevailed between the parties and the same has been annexed as Annexure-2. The petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 16.12.2021. Learned APP appearing for the state has opposed the prayer of regular bail.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with Riga P.S. Case No. 344 of 2021 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M.-VI, Sitamarhi. (Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) amandeep/- U T