← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./62710/2024bail granted

Girish Rai v. The State Of Bihar

2024-09-03Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.62710 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-236 Year-2024 Thana- PAROO District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== Girish Rai Son of Sukhdev Rai R/O Vill.- Mathihani, P.S.- Paroo, Dist.- Muzaffarpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Priyesh Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Bishweshwar Ram, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 03-09-2024

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act in connection with Paroo P.S. Case No.236 of 2024.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has antecedent of six cases and allegation is of recovery of 648 liters of liquor from field of Dinesh Rai.

4. It is next submitted that petitioner was not arrested from the spot as such nothing was recovered from his conscious possession and even alleged recovery is from a place which

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.62710 of 2024(2) dt.03-09-2024 2/3 does not belong to the petitioner and is accessible to public at large and he came to be implicated at the instance of Chowkidar. It is next submitted police in majority of the cases implicates either at the instance of the 'Chowkidar', local person, secret information or confessional statement in a mechanical manner without holding proper investigation. It is also submitted that once an accused is implicated in a case relating to excise, in that event the police starts implicating mechanically.

5. The learned APP for the State opposes the anticipatory bail application.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs.30,000/- (Rupees Thirty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Exclusive Special Judge, Excise Court No.II, Muzaffarpur in connection with Paroo P.S. Case No.236 of 2024, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

7. It is made clear that the learned trial court before accepting the bail bonds of the petitioner shall verify the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.62710 of 2024(2) dt.03-09-2024 3/3 criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in the event, if it is found that petitioner has antecedent of more than six cases, in that event, the present anticipatory bail order shall not be given effect.

8. The application stands allowed.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Prakash Narayan U T