Bittu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.58451 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-64 Year-2023 Thana- MANPUR District- Nalanda ====================================================== Bittu Kumar son of Indal Paswan Resident of village- Naubatpur Lotan, PsManpur, Dist- nalanda ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Ratan Mistri son of Sitaram Mistri Resident of village- Naubatpur Lotan, PsManpur, Dist- nalanda ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rana Baljit Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Md. Mushtaque Alam ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 18-11-2025 1.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 363, 366A, 504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that on 17-4-2023 at 3 am, his daughter had gone out of the house to attend the call of nature, but did not return, thereafter a search was made when informant came to know that petitioner enticed his daughter away.

4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is next submitted that petitioner and the victim were

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.58451 of 2025(3) dt.18-11-2025 2/2 in love and they eloped and they performed their marriage and out of the wedlock, a child was born. It is also submitted that victim presently is staying with the petitioner and to give seriousness to the case, it has been alleged in the FIR that victim is a minor. It is further submitted that notices were issued by the OP No. 2, but then OP No. 2 despite receiving notice, chooses not to appear and contest, which further demonstrates the falsity of the allegation. 5.

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

6.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Manpur P.S. Case No. 64 of 2023, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the BNSS. (Satyavrat Verma, J) Sumit/- U T