← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/3359/2013disposed

Md. Siddique v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-05-10The Chief Justice2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No 3359 of 2013 IN Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No 6022 of 2008 =========================================================== Md Siddique S/O Md. Nezamuddin Resident Of Village And Post Office- Khiri Bandh, Police Station- Jagdishpur, District- Bhagalpur. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar through the Principal Secretary- Cum- Commissioner of Mines, Bihar, Patna Dr. K.P. Ramaiya.

2. Mr. Shubhkirti Mazumdar Ex- Commissioner of Mines Government of Bihar, Patna

3. Dr. K.P. Ramaiya, Commissioner, Of Mines- Cum- Principal Secretary, Department Of Mines And Geology Vikash Bhawan, Patna- 800001.

4. Prem Singh Mina, the Collector, Bhagalpur.

5. Manoj Kumar Mishra, Mineral Development Officer, Bhagalpur. .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr D K Karn, Advocate For the Opposite Parties : Mr Rajendra Prasad, Spl PP, Mines =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 10-05-2017 Inter alia contending that certain directions issued in CWJC No 6022 of 2008 on 25.11.2011 in the matter of refund of earnest money and security amount have not been complied with, the application for initiating contempt has been filed and from the supplementary show cause filed by the Opposite Parties on 28th of March 2017, it transpires that a sum of Rs 5,14,600/-, after deduction of certain amount, has been credited to the account of the petitioner. 2 That being so, now no further action is required to be taken in the matter. Even though belatedly, the Opposite Parties have

Patna High Court MJC No.3359 of 2013 dt.10-05-2017 2/2 complied the order and tendered apology for the delay, the same is accepted and in view of this, Opposite Parties are discharged from contempt proceedings.

3 In case the petitioner has any grievance with regard to the compliance made, he may initiate proceedings afresh. 4 With the aforesaid liberty, this application is disposed of.

(Rajendra Menon, CJ) M.E.H./- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 16.05.2017 Transmission Date NA