Ramnath Ram v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.58790 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-147 Year-2025 Thana- KOTWA District- East Champaran ====================================================== 1.

Ramnath Ram son of Late Laldhari Ram Resident of village- Talwa Pokhar, Ps- Kotwa, dist- East Champaran 2.

Shvi Pujan Ram son of Late Laldhari Ram Resident of village- Talwa Pokhar, Ps- Kotwa, dist- East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rakesh Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Dr. Ajeet Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 09-09-2025

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners seek bail in anticipation of their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(1),115(1),118(1),109(1),303(1),3(5) of the B.N.S.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are persons with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that accused persons came and Ramnath Ram assaulted her by farsa causing injury on head. Further, Shiv Pujan assaulted her son with Bhala causing injury on head, thereafter all accused assaulted her husband and son, while Lalti Devi snatched her gold mangalsutra and Naresh along with Ram

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.58790 of 2025(2) dt.09-09-2025 2/3 Pravesh stole Rs.80,000/- from the house.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners have been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is next submitted that on account of land dispute, the occurrence took place as informant's side were trying to capture the land settled in favour of father of the petitioners in the year 1970-71 by the Government. It is also submitted that since informant's side were eyeing the land settled in favour of the father of the petitioner, as such, a dispute had arisen an altercation took place in which both sides assaulted each other. It is further submitted that from perusal of Annexure-6, it would manifest that the injury suffered by the injured is simple in nature, which amply demonstrates that petitioners never had any intention of committing a serious occurrence. It is also submitted that petitioners are not criminal.

5. Learned A.P.P. opposes the anticipatory bail application.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners, above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks, are directed to be released on anticipatory bail on their furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.58790 of 2025(2) dt.09-09-2025 3/3 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned J.M., 1st Class, Motihari, East Champaran in connection with Kotwa P. S. Case No.147 of 2025, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) vikash/- U T