← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./65343/2024bail granted

Kundan Yadav @ Kundan Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2024-09-06Mr. Justice R. P. Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.65343 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-71 Year-2024 Thana- KURSAKANTA District- Araria ====================================================== Kundan Yadav @ Kundan Kumar Yadav Son of Shail Kumar Yadav VillageHatta Bakhri, Ps- Kursakanta, Dist- Araria ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Mrigendra Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms. Sangeeta Sharma, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 07-09-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Kursakanta PS Case No. 71 of 2024 instituted for the offences under Sections 8/20(b)(ii)(B) of the NDPS Act. 3.

Prosecution allegation, in short, is that there is recovery of total 13 Kg of ganja, out of which 6 kg of ganja has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. 4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. No incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that petitioner has no concern with

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.65343 of 2024(2) dt.07-09-2024 2/2 the recovered contraband. The recovered contraband is below the commercial quantity. Hence, Section 37 of the N.D.P.S. Act is not applicable in the present case. The petitioner is in custody since 15-05-2024 and has got two criminal antecedents. There is no compliance of Sections 42 and 50 of the N.D.P.S. Act. 5.

Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner. 6.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, recovery below commercial quantity and the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7.

Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Kursakanta PS Case No. 71 of 2024.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) rishi/- U T