Badhu Mian v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.793 of 2015 ====================================================== Badhu Mian Son of Late Ishshak Mian Resident of Village Mangalpur Gudaria, P.S.- Nautan, District- West Champaran. .... .... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mukesh Kumar, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Md.Sufiyan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMARESH KUMAR LAL ORAL ORDER 11-03-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 304(B), 201, 120B/34 of IPC. Allegation against the accused including the petitioner is to have demanded a motor-cycle in dowry and due to non-fulfilment of demand of dowry, the deceased had been killed and her dead body had been disposed of.
It is submitted that the petitioner is the father-in-law of the deceased. He was separate from the deceased and her husband prior to the occurrence. He has no criminal antecedent. However, after investigation charge-sheet has been submitted and there is no chance of tampering with the witnesses. During investigation, it has come to light that there was altercation between the deceased and her husband.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.793 of 2015 (3) dt.11-03-2015 2/2 Learned counsel for the State could not controvert the contention of the petitioner while opposing his prayer for bail. Considering the facts and circumstances, the above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri Balendra Shukla, Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, West- Champaran, Bettiah/court concerned in Nautan P. S. Case No. 198 of 2014 with following conditions:-
1. The petitioner will not indulge himself in similar or any other offence.
2. One of the bailors must be the close relative of the petitioner.
3. The petitioner will be well represented in the Court on each and every date and in case of absence for two consecutive dates or in case of violation of terms of bail, his bail bond would be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.
(Amaresh Kumar Lal, J) Kanchan/- U T