Vijay Rajwanshi @ Vijay Rajwar @ Vijay Rajwansi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.63928 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-53 Year-2025 Thana- PALIGANJ District- Patna ====================================================== Vijay Rajwanshi @ Vijay Rajwar @ VIJAY RAJWANSI S/o Late Bhagwan Rajwanshi @ Late Bhagwan Rajwansi R/o Village- Bibipur, Sarsi, P.S.- Paliganj, District- Patna ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Vishal Ranjan, Adv.

Mr.Ayush Kumar, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mrs.Shaheen Begum, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 23-09-2025

1. Heard Mr. Vishal Ranjan, learned counsel for the petitioner assisted by Mr. Ayush Kumar, learned Advocate and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126, 115(2), 118, 109, 352, 3(5) of BNS.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that on 27.01.2025, while his father was guarding paddy crop in the night, the accused persons including the petitioner came with an intent to steal paddy and assaulted his father with lathi and sword causing injury.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.63928 of 2025(2) dt.23-09-2025 2/3 petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is next submitted that from perusal of the allegation as alleged in the F.I.R., it would manifest that on account of dispute relating to land, the accused persons including the petitioner has been implicated in the case by the informant. It is also submitted no doubt allegation of assaulting the father of the informant is alleged but then allegation of assault is not specific. It is further submitted that from perusal of the order impugned, it would manifest that the same records the injury report issued by the P.H.C., Paliganj. The injury of the injured Shivdas Ravidas shows that they sustained simple injury in the alleged occurrence caused by sharp weapon and thereafter, the father of the informant also got treated at P.M.C.H., where C.T. Scan was done and the same recorded multiple fracture in Zygoma, left parietal bone and transverse fracture along the occipital bone.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner and submits that the order impugned also rebuts about the nature of injury suffered by the father of the informant but then the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that specific allegation of assault is not alleged nor informant is an eye witness to the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.63928 of 2025(2) dt.23-09-2025 3/3 occurrence and petitioner is not a criminal.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Paliganj P.S. Case No. 53 of 2025 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of BNSS.

7. Accordingly, the instant anticipatory bail application stands allowed.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) pallavi/- U T