Savita Kumari v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.23127 of 2011 ======================================================
1. Savita Kumari Wife Of Sri Raj Kumar Sah Resident Of Mohalla Bakhari East, Ward No. 03, P.S. Bakhari, Dist.-Begusarai, At Present Posted As A.N.M. Primary Health Centre, Balia, District Begusarai .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State Of Bihar
2. The Principal Secretary, Department Of Health, Government Of Bihar, Patna
3. The District Magistrate, Begusarai
4. Dr. Sonalal Akela, The Civil Surgeon-Cum-Chief Medical Officer, Begusarai, Civil Surgeon Office, Begusarai
5. The District Immunization Officer, Begusarai, District Immunisation Office, Begusarai
6. Dr. Mahendra Prasad Chaudhary, Incharge Medical Officer, Primary Health Centre, Bakhari, P.S. Bakhari, District-Begusarai .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : None For the Respondent/s : Mr. Rajiv Roy Gp5 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KISHORE KUMAR MANDAL ORAL ORDER 27-01-2015 Nobody appears on behalf of the petitioner. A.C. to G.P. 5 for the State is present.
A counter affidavit has been filed.
The application was preferred by the petitioner against the order dated passed by the Civil Surgeon-cum-Chief Medical Officer, Begusarai whereby a departmental proceeding was initiated and she was placed under suspension. Counsel for the State has drawn attention of the Court to the diverse statements made in the counter affidavit in
Patna High Court CWJC No.23127 of 2011 (3) dt.27-01-2015 order to submit that during the pendency of the application, the proceeding has already been concluded inasmuch minor punishment has been inflicted on her. The petitioner, if aggrieved, may raise the grievance thereagainst in accordance with law/provisions contained in the relevant rules. This appears to be the reason for not prosecuting the present application by the petitioner.
The application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
(Kishore Kumar Mandal, J) Pankaj/- U