Shanti Devi v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.62124 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-60 Year-2023 Thana- SIKRAUL District- Buxar ====================================================== 1.
SHANTI DEVI WIFE OF SRI RAMJI SINGH RESIDENT OF VILLAGESIKRAUL, P.S.- SIKRAUL, DISTRICT- BUXAR. 2.
RAMJI SINGH SON OF BIDESHI SINGH RESIDENT OF VILLAGESIKRAUL, P.S.- SIKRAUL, DISTRICT- BUXAR. 3.
BABITA DEVI WIFE OF SRI BESUN SINGH RESIDENT OF VILLAGESIKRAUL, P.S.- SIKRAUL, DISTRICT- BUXAR. 4.
CHUNU SINGH @ CHUNNU SINGH SON OF SRI SUNIL SINGH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- SIKRAUL, P.S.- SIKRAUL, DISTRICTBUXAR. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Chandra Mohan Singh, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Awadhesh Kumar Singh, APP.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 18-10-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 504 and 307 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. Allegedly, all the accused persons, having deadly weapons came to the informant and started abusing. On objection, all the accused persons assaulted the informant's side brutally.
4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioners are quite innocent and have committed no offence. No such occurrence as alleged ever took place.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.62124 of 2023(2) dt.18-10-2023 2/2 Petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case due to ulterior motive. The allegation levelled against the petitioners is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. There is admitted land dispute between the parties. There is case and counter case between the parties. The injuries caused by these petitioners to the informant's side are simple in nature. Petitioners have no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-3 of this application.
5. Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for bail.
6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the nature of the injuries, let the above named petitioners, be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned lower Court where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Sikraul P.S. Case No. 60 of 2023, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) divyanshi/- U T