Md. Rizwanul Haque v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2987 of 2015 ====================================================== Md. Rizwanul Haque Son of Late Md. Salimuddin Resident of Village Dhobighatta Rasoolpur, P.S. Balia Belown District Katihar. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Special Director, Secondary Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Bihar State Madarsa Education Board, Patna, Vidyapati Marg through its Secretary.

4. The Chairman of the Bihar State Madarsa Education Board, Vidyapati Marg, Patna.

5. The Secretary, Bihar State Madarsa Education Board, Patna. .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Siyaram Shahi, Advocate Ms. Shally Kumari, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. A.K.Chaudhary, AAG-13 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE) 12-01-2016 Heard Mr. Siyaram Shahi, learned Counsel for the petitioner, and Mr. Ashok Kumar Chaudhary, learned Additional Advocate General No. 13, appearing for the State respondents. After some arguments, Mr. Siyaram Shahi, learned Counsel for the petitioner, seeks permission to withdraw this application, made, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, in the nature of Public Interest Litigation, with liberty to approach the appropriate authority with appropriate application, if so advised, and/or to take recourse to such provisions of law as may

Patna High Court CWJC No.2987 of 2015 (2) dt.12-01-2016 2/2 be permissible.

No objection has been raised by the respondents to the prayer for withdrawal made by the petitioner. In view of the above and in the interest of justice, this writ application is hereby disposed of as withdrawn with liberty granted to the petitioner to approach the appropriate authority with appropriate application, if so advised, and/or to take recourse to such provisions of law as may be permissible. However, we make it clear that we have not expressed any opinion on the merit of the present writ petition. (I.A. Ansari, ACJ) (Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J) Pawan/- U