← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/1935/2016dismissed

Anand Madhukar v. The State Of Bihar

2021-12-09The Chief Justice -2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1935 of 2016 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12402 of 2013 ====================================================== Anand Madhukar, Son of Sh. Kamal Priya Nandan Prasad Singh, Lalji Tola, Police Station Kadamkuan, Town and District- Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Industries, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Additional Secretary, Department of Industries, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 3.

The Under Secretary, Department of Industries, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 4.

Infrastructure Development Authority, Udyog Bhawan, East Gandhi Maidan, Patna, through its Managing Director, 5.

Managing Director, Infrastructure Development Authority, Udyog Bhawan, East Gandhi Maidan, Patna.

6.

Director, Administration, Infrastructure Development Authority, Udyog Bhawan, East Gandhi Maidan, Patna.

7.

Mukesh Narayan Sinha, S/o Late Jagdish Narayan Sinha, R/o VillageAmritpur, Police Station- Tajpur, District- Samastipur. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sanjay Parasmani, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ORAL ORDER 09-12-2021 The disciplinary proceeding initiated against the petitioner was the subject matter of challenge by way of a writ petition being CWJC No.12402 of 2013, titled as Anand Madhukar Vs. The State of Bihar & Ors., which stood dismissed for want of prosecution, vide order dated 11.04.2016. The current application for recall of the order and restoration of the writ petition does not reveal reasons sufficient

Patna High Court MJC No.1935 of 2016(2) dt.09-12-2021 2/2 enough for recall of the order. The delay is not sufficiently explained. That apart, perhaps, with the passage of time, the main petition, filed in the year 2013 itself, would have become infrucuous.

As such, the present application stands dismissed. (Sanjay Karol, CJ) Ashwini/Sujit U