Patna High CourtMJC/538/2015disposed

Dr. Surendra Kumar v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2019-01-15Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.434 of 2015 ====================================================== Dr. Sarjug Prasad son of late Sheo Charan Prasad resident of Professor Colony, Udantpuri, Garhpar, Biharsharif, District Nalanda. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar and Ors

2. Magadh University, Bodh Gaya through its Registrar, Dr. Dinesh Kumar Yadav

3. Md. Istiaque, the Vice Chancellor, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya.

4. Dr. Divesh Kumar Sinha, the Finance Officer, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya.

5. Dr. Raj Kumar Majumdar, the Principal, Sardar Patel Memorial College, Udantpuri, Biharsharif, Nalan ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== with Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No. 538 of 2015 ====================================================== Dr. Surendra Kumar Son of Late Motichand Prasad. Resident of Princess Villa, Nalanda Colony, Biharsharif, Nalanda.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar and Ors

2. Magadh University, Bodh Gaya through its Registrar, Dr. Dinesh Kumar Yadav.

3. Md. Istiaque, the Vice-Chancellor, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya.

4. Dr. Dinesh Kumar Sinha, the Finance Officer, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya.

5. Dr. Raj Kumar Majumdar, the Principal, Sardar Patel Memorial College, Udantpuri, Biharsharif, Nalan ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

(In Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No. 434 of 2015) For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Vidya Sagar For the Respondent/s :

Mr.S.K. Sharma Ga1 (In Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No. 538 of 2015) For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Vidya Sagar For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Ga1-S.K.Sharma ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 15-01-2019 Considering the fact that the petitioner has been paid salary in terms of the order of the writ court, the court does not

Patna High Court MJC No.434 of 2015(10) dt.15-01-2019 2/2 find any justification to proceed any further. However, if the petitioner is aggrieved by delayed payment and opposite party denied interest on delayed payment, liberty shall be available to the petitioner to approach the appropriate forum including the writ court for such claim in accordance with law. With the aforesaid liberty, the present contempt application stands disposed of.

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) mdrashid/- U