Patna High CourtCR. MISC./55599/2019bail granted

Md. Nejamuddin @ Nasruddin @ Nasaru @ Md. Nasruddin Ansari v. The State Of Bihar

2019-11-27Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.55599 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-128 Year-2019 Thana- BARUN DistrictAurangabad ====================================================== MD. NEJAMUDDIN @ NASRUDDIN @ NASARU @ MD. NASRUDDIN ANSARI Son of Najaruddin Ansari Resident of Village - Jogiya, P.S.- Barun, District- Aurangabad ... ... Petitioner

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh, Advocate.

For the Opposite Party:

Mr. Bal Mukund Prasad Sinha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 27-11-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is in custody since 09.07.2019 in connection with Barun P.S. Case No. 128 of 2019 for the offences alleged under Sections 147, 148, 149, 153, 153(A), 295(A), 323, 341, 307, 353, 337, 427, 504 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3⁄4 of the Prevention of Damage of Public Property Act.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated and the F.I.R. is against as many as 30 named and 30 unknown persons. The accusations are general and omnibus in nature without any specific accusation attributed to the petitioner.

4. Be that as it may, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad, in connection with Barun P.S. Case No. 128 of 2019, on the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.55599 of 2019(3) dt.27-11-2019 2/2 following conditions- (i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial. (iii) That the petitioner shall cooperate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail. (iv) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

(Vikash Jain, J) Ibrar//- U T