Ravi Bhushan Prasad Sinha v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13525 of 2023 ====================================================== Ravi Bhushan Prasad Sinha, aged about 74 years, Gender- Male, Son of Surya Narayan Prasad, Resident of Ward No. 37- Ashok Nagar, Pokharia, Begusarai, P.O. and P.S.- Begusarai, District- Begusarai. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary cum Commissioner, Urban Development and Housing Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2.
The Municipal Commissioner, Samastipur Municipal Corporation, Samastipur.
3.
The Standing Committee through the Chairman, Municipal Corporation, Samastipur.
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Vikash Kumar Jha, Advocate For the Respondent/s :
Mr.Abbas Haider ( Sc 6 ) For the Nagar Nigam Samastipur :
Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 04-10-2023 Heard Mr. Vikash Kumar Jha, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner; Mr. Abbas Haider, learned SC 6 for the State and Mr. Ashok Kumar, learned counsel for the Nagar Nigam, Samastipur.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has given instruction that this case is covered by the order dated 07.07.2020 passed by this Court in CWJC No.10633 of 2019, titled as Lalan Prasad Singh Versus the State of Bihar and Ors.
3. Considering the aforesaid submission made on
Patna High Court CWJC No.13525 of 2023 dt.04-10-2023 2/2 behalf of petitioner, the Municipal Commissioner, Samastipur is directed to call for the service particulars of the petitioner and thereafter verify as to whether the case of the petitioner is covered by the decision rendered in Lalan Prasad Singh (Supra). In case, the case of the petitioner is similar to Lalan Prasad Singh (Supra), then the retiral dues, as claimed for in the present writ petition, are required to be paid to the petitioner within a period of four weeks from the date of communication of this order.
4. In case, the authority finds that the case of the petitioner is not identical to that of Lalan Prasad Singh (Supra), then an opportunity of hearing is required to be given to the petitioner and thereafter he will pass a reasoned order in accordance with law within the aforesaid period.
5. With aforesaid observation and direction, the writ petition stands disposed of.
(Purnendu Singh, J) Sanjay/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 05.10.2023 Transmission Date NA