Dwarika Singh @ Dwarika Nath Singh And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.15644 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -220 Year- 2016 Thana -DINARA District- SASARAM (ROHTAS) ======================================================

1. Dwarika Singh @ Dwarika Nath Singh, son of late Ram Iqbal Singh

2. Phuleshwari Devi, wife of Dwarika Nath Singh @ Dwarika Singh Both are resident of village- Semari Dih, P.S.- Dinara, District- Rohtas. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dineshwar Pandey, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Dr. Rabindra Kumar, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 25-04-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in Dinara P.S. Case No. 220 of 2016 instituted for the offence under Sections 341, 323, 504, 498(A) and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Petitioners are father-in-law and mother in-law of the informant.

From the written report it appears that there is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioners. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioners, named above, within six weeks from today, in connection with Dinara P.S. Case No.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.15644 of 2017 (2) dt.25-04-2017 2/2 220 of 2016, they shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Bikramganj, Rohtas, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr. P.C. with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned,

(2) petitioners shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioners and (3) if petitioners tamper with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioners.

(Sanjay Priya, J) S.Ali/- U T