Chhotu Prasad v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.71011 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-94 Year-2021 Thana- KAKO District- Jehanabad ====================================================== 1.

CHHOTU PRASAD Son of Late Deonandan Yadav Resident of Village - Mai Math, P.S.- Bhelwar O.P., Distt.- Jehanabad. 2.

Rahish Kumar @ Ravi Ranjan Kumar Son of Chhotu Prasad Resident of Village - Mai Math, P.S.- Bhelwar O.P., Distt.- Jehanabad. 3.

Guddu Kumar @ Rohit Prakash Son of Chhotu Prasad Resident of Village - Mai Math, P.S.- Bhelwar O.P., Distt.- Jehanabad. 4.

Vikki Kumar @ Sonu Kumar Son of Jai Prakash Yadav Resident of Village - Kanaua, P.S.- Shakurabad, Distt.- Jehanabad.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Parashuram Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Satyadeo Singh Yadav ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 08-06-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioners are permitted to remove the defect(s), as pointed out by the office, if any, within a period of three weeks from today.

The Petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 325, 379, 504, 506, 448 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation against the petitioners is to assault Amarjit Kumar (son of the Informant) and informant's family members.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.71011 of 2021(2) dt.08-06-2022 2/2 Golden chain and ornaments were also stolen by them. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that allegation against the petitioners is general and omnibus. The present case arises out of case and counter case. The petitioners have no criminal antecedent as stated at para 3 of the bail petition.

Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the bail petition of the petitioners.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the above named petitioners, in the event of their arrest/surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM-I, Jehanabad in connection with Kako(Bhelawar OP) P.S. Case No. 94 of 2021, subject to condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) Gautam/- U T