Whirlpool Of India Ltd. v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4262 of 2015 ====================================================== Whirlpool Of India Ltd. , a Company incorporated under the Companies Act , 1956 having its Head Office at Whirlpool House, Plot No. 40 , Sector - 44, P.O. Gurgaon, P.S. Gurgaon-122002 (Haryana) and Branch office at Shalimar Cold Storege, Anishabad , P.O. Anishabad , P.S. Anishabad , District- Patna through its Authorized Signatory, Randhir Kumar Son of Shri Ram Naresh Thakur resident of A24, Ashok Enclave-II, Sector 37, P.O.+ P.S. Sector 37 , Faridabad Haryana.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Commissioner of Commercial Taxes , Bihar , Patna having its office at Vikash Bhawan , Bailey Road , Patna.

2. Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Taxes , Patliputra Circle, Patna.

3. Commercial Taxes Officer, Patliputra Circle, Patna. .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. D.V.Pathy with Ms.Manju Jha, Advocates For the Respondent/s : Mr. Raj Nandan Prasad, SC 9 with Mr. Rakesh Kumar, AC to SC 9 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH KUMAR DATTA and HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH KUMAR DATTA) 22-06-2015 Learned Standing Counsel No.9 today informs this Court that the Chairman of the Commercial Taxes Tribunal has assumed charge of his office and the Tribunal has become functional. In the aforesaid circumstances, the writ application is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to approach the Tribunal against the impugned order and for grant of interim protection as may be deemed fit.

In case any such appeal is filed by the petitioner within a

Patna High Court CWJC No.4262 of 2015 (7) dt.22-06-2015 period of four weeks from today along with an application for condonation of delay in filing the same, the Tribunal shall consider the matter keeping in view the fact that the petitioner has been pursuing its remedy before this Court.

(Ramesh Kumar Datta, J) (Anjana Mishra, J) spal/- U