Rameshwar Ranjan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.64801 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-179 Year-2024 Thana- KOILWAR District- Bhojpur ====================================================== Rameshwar Ranjan S/o Lakshman Prasad Resident of Village- Shahpur Main Road, ward no. 4, P.S- Shahpur, District- Bhojpur, The then Grameen Awas Sahayak, Koilwar Block, Distt. - Bhojpur (Bihar) ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Abhay Kumar Pandey, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Damodar Prasad Tiwary, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 01-10-2024 Heard Mr.Abhay Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.Damodar Prasad Tiwary, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Koilwar P.S.Case No.179 of 2024, FIR dated 06.04.2024 registered for the offences punishable under Section, 420,467,468 & 471 of IPC.

3. Allegation against the petitioner is that he got the job on the basis of the forged and fabricated certificate which he had produced at the time of his joining.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has clean antecedent. He has falsely been implicated in the present case. As per FIR, allegation against the petitioner

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.64801 of 2024(2) dt.01-10-2024 2/3 is that he obtained the job on the basis of the forged and fabricated certificate which he had produced at the time of entering into the job. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that although petitioner submitted all the certificates which he received from the competent Board/ University and after the institution of the present FIR, the petitioner has been terminated from the Institution in question.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and petitioner has clean antecedent, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of thirty days from the date of receipt of the order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000 (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhojpur at Ara in connection with Koilwar P.S.Case No.179 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure and with other following conditions:- (I) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.64801 of 2024(2) dt.01-10-2024 3/3 on his/her absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his/her bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below. (II) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(III) And, further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage, it is found that the petitioner has concealed his/her criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Nitesh/- U T