Smt Manju Devi v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.41866 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -225 Year- 2016 Thana -ATHMALGOLA District- PATNA ======================================================
1. Smt Manju Devi, W/o Harendra Singh @ Hira singh,
2. Kajal Kumari @ Baby Kumari, D/o Harendra Singh @ Hira Singh, Both R/o village- Karjan, P.S.- Athmalgola, District- Patna. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajni Kant Jha, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ram Anurag Singh, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 12-09-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State.
The petitioners apprehend their arrest in Athmal Gola P.S. Case No. 225 of 2016 instituted for the offence under Sections 304(B) and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that they are mother-in-law and sister-in-law of the deceased. It has further been submitted that victim girl has given her statement in NMCH wherein she has stated that she sustained burn injury by bursting of stove while she was boiling milk for her baby. In the written report there is no specific allegation against the petitioners.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case,
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.41866 of 2017 (2) dt.12-09-2017 2/2 prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioners, named above, within six weeks from today, in connection with Aathmal Gola P.S. Case No. 225 of 2016, they shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Barh, Distt. Patna, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr. P.C. with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned,
(2) petitioners shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioners and (3) if petitioners tamper with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioners.
(Sanjay Priya, J) S.Ali/- U T