Haridas Ram v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.64423 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-106 Year-2025 Thana- MOHANIYA District- Kaimur (Bhabua) ====================================================== Haridas Ram S/o Lal Bihari Ram @ Bihari Ram R/o Village- Amarpura, P.S.- Mohania, District- Kaimur (Bhabua) ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rakesh Kumar Mishra For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Surendra Prasad Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 25-09-2025

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 109, 352, 351(2), 351(3), 3(5) of the B.N.S.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that while he was returning home from Ravidas Temple and reached near house of Bihari Ram, when Haridas assaulted him by a sharp edged weapon causing injury on head at the instance of Bihari Ram, who was carrying pistol, thereafter all five sons of Bihari Ram assaulted while Ravikant assaulted by an iron rod causing injury on hand of Vijay and

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.64423 of 2025(2) dt.25-09-2025 2/3 Munna along with Santosh snatched his golden chain and Rs.1500/-.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is next submitted that on account of dispute relating to passage, an altercation took place in which both sides assaulted each other. It is next submitted that from perusal of the allegation as alleged in the FIR, it manifests that informant alleges that he was assaulted by all the accused persons, but then, from perusal of the injury report annexed as Annexure-3 to the anticipatory bail application, it would manifest that the injury suffered by the injured is simple in nature. It is also submitted that petitioner is not a criminal and will not abscond rather will cooperate in the investigation to prove his innocence.

5. Learned A.P.P. opposes the anticipatory bail application.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner, above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks, is directed to be released on anticipatory bail on his furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.64423 of 2025(2) dt.25-09-2025 3/3 amount each to the satisfaction of the learned ACJM-1, Mohania, Kaimur at Bhabhua in connection with Mohania P. S. Case No.106 of 2025, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) vikash/- U T