Indrajeet Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.62147 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-2 Year-2024 Thana- AAJAM NAGAR District- Katihar ====================================================== Indrajeet Yadav S/O Sukra Yadav @ Sukadev Yadav R/O Village- Katghar Durgapur, P.S- Pranpur, Distt.- Katihar.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Bimal Kumar, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Pranav Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 04-09-2024 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is apprehending arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable in connection with Azamnagar P.S. Case No.02 of 2024 under Sections 341, 323, 384, 386, 307, 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code read with Section 27 of the Arms Act read with 30(a) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018.

3. As per the prosecution, the FIR has been lodged against three named accused persons and two unknown accused persons including the petitioner against whom there is allegation that they have assaulted the informant.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He submits

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.62147 of 2024(2) dt.04-09-2024 2/3 that the informant is Sarpanch of the locality and he has filed the case against his full brother and his friends due to petty family dispute.

5. Counsel further submits that the Sarpanch is a influential person. He further submits that the allegation made in the F.I.R. is appears to be false in the light of seizure. He further submits that from the F.I.R., it has been intimated that the accused persons have reached at the shop of the informant by car and the police has seized the said car which is not in a position to move.

6. Counsel also submits that antecedent of the petitioner is not clean. There are four criminal cases pending against him in which he is on bail in all cases.

7. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that the petitioner's antecedent is not clean.

8. In the present facts and circumstances, let the above named petitioner be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of 6 weeks from today and on being satisfied by the trial court that the petitioner is not absconding in any of the cases which are pending against him whose details are mentioned below, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.30,000/- (Rupees Thirty

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.62147 of 2024(2) dt.04-09-2024 3/3 thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional District & Sessions Judge, Exclusive Excise Court No.II, Katihar in connection with Azamnagar P.S. Case No.02 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

9. The details of the cases which are pending against the petitioner, are as follows:- i. Katihar SC/ST P.S. Case No. 31 of 2022.

ii. Azamnagar P.S. Case No. 455 of 2023.

iii. Azamnagar P.S. Case No. 456 of 2023.

iv. Pranpur P.S. Case no. 61 of 2024.

(Dr. Anshuman, J.) Prakashmani/- U T