Md. Niyaz @ Neyaz Ahmad v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5865 of 2015 ====================================================== Md. Niyaz @ Neyaz Ahmad Son of Iddan Dhobi, Resident of Village Dakhin Tola, P.O.Siwan Town, District Siwan.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar and Ors 2.

The District Magistrate, Siwan.

3.

The Superintendent of Police, Siwan.

4.

The Additional Collector, Siwan.

5.

The D.C.L.R., Siwan Sadar, Siwan.

6.

The Circle Officer, Siwan Sadar, Siwan.

7.

Roj Ahmad, Son of Late Jakir Hussain.

8.

Sallauddin, Son of Late Doma Hussain. Both 7 and 8 residents of Village Dakhin Tola, P.O. Siwan, P.S. Siwan Town, District Siwan. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mrs. Shyama Rani, Adv.

Mr. Ajay Kumar Pandey, Adv.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr. P.K.Singh, SC-12 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 07-07-2025 Heard Mrs. Shyama Rani, learned counsel for the petitioner, the State as usual, is absent.

2. The present writ petition has been preferred for the following relief(s):

for issuance of a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ/order/ direction commanding State Respondents Authorities to open the lock from the Holding No. 353 belonging to petitioner, which has been locked by the Respondent No.6 illegally and forcefully behind the back

Patna High Court CWJC No.5865 of 2015(3) dt.07-07-2025 2/2 of petitioner, in compliance of an order passed in favour of private Respondent No.7 and 8 by Respondent No.5 with respect to Holding No. 352 and for grant of any other suitable relief/reliefs for which petitioner is found entitled in the eye of law.

3. This Court has gone through the counter affidavit filed on behalf of the Circle Officer, Siwan, Sadar, copy of which was duly served upon the learned counsel for the petitioner on 01.09.2015. In paragraph 4 of the said affidavit, it has been recorded that no action has been taken in respect of the Holding No. 353 and the statement in this regard by the petitioner is/are merely allegation.

4. As recorded, the copy of the counter affidavit was served upon the petitioner ten years ago, not stands rebutted, accepting the words of the Circle Officer, Siwan, Sadar, the writ petition is dismissed.

5. Pending I.A.(s), if any, also stands disposed of. (Rajiv Roy, J) Vijay Singh/- U