← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/3368/2019disposed

Dr. Vinay Prasad Singh, v. The Magadh University, Bodh Gaya,

2022-07-06Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3368 of 2019 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7192 of 2019 ====================================================== Dr. Vinay Prasad Singh, Son of Late Ram Lagan Singh, Resident of Jagdev Path, Anand Bihar, Colony, House No. C/18, P.O. - B.V. College, P.S. - Rupaspur. District - Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The Magadh University, Bodh Gaya, through it Registrar. 2.

Prof. Dr. Devi Prasad Tiwari, The Vice Chancellor, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya, Gaya.

3.

Capt. Jagat Singh, Rana, The Registrar, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya, Gaya.

4.

The Patliputra University, Patna through its Registrar. 5.

Sri Gulab Chand Ram, Jaiswal, The Vice Chancellor, Patliputra University, Patna.

6.

Sri Kamlesh Kumar, The Registrar, Patliputra University, Patna. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Suraj Narain Yadav, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Syed Firoz Raza, APP For Magadh University :

Mr. Ritesh Kumar, Advocate For Patliputra University: Dr. Anand Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 06-07-2022 In compliance of the order of this Court, disobedience whereof has been complained of, the contemner University has filed a show cause in which it has taken a stand that a sum of Rs. 18,26,820/- has been found payable towards the differential amount of arrears of salary for the period 16.05.2009 to August, 2017, whereafter request had been sent to the State Government several times for release of grant for making payment to the

Patna High Court MJC No.3368 of 2019(6) dt.06-07-2022 2/2 petitioner herein, however, till date the Government has not diverted any fund for the purposes of making payment to the petitioner and others.

Having regard to the aforesaid stand taken by the University, I deem it fit and proper to dispose off the present contempt petition with liberty to the petitioner to approach the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna for redressal of his grievances. It is needless to state that the petitioner would be at liberty to file a fresh writ petition in case his grievances/claim stand unredressed.

This order is being passed in the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case since the State Government was neither a party in the writ petition nor in the present contempt petition, hence the State Government cannot be hauled up for contempt at this stage and in the present proceedings. Accordingly, this petition stands disposed off. (Mohit Kumar Shah, J) S.Sb/- U