Md. Aminul Islam v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.70104 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-289 Year-2020 Thana- BAISI District- Purnia ====================================================== 1.
MD. AMINUL ISLAM Son of Ansar Ali Resident of Bijni Kwatika, P.S.- Bijni, District - Chirang, (Assam).
2.
Md. Ghurus Ali @ Md. Jhurus Ali @ Md. Suruj Ali @ Md. Churus Ali Son of Samouddin Resident of Nashangndi, P.S.- Bongaigaon, District - Bongaigon, (Assam) ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Vikram Deo Singh, Advocate Mr. Md Fazle Karim, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Humayou Ahmad Khan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 24-05-2022 Heard Mr. Vikram Deo Singh assisted by Md. Fazle Karim, learned counsel, who represent the petitioners and Mr. Humayou Ahmad Khan, learned APP for the State. Let the defect(s), if any, as pointed out by the office be removed within four weeks.
The petitioners are in judicial custody in connection with Special Case No. 22 of 2020 arising out of Baisi P.S. Case No. 289 of 2020 registered under Sections 8, 20(b) (ii) (c) and 25 of the Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act. Allegation in the FIR is that the police got secret information and acting upon that they intercepted a Bolero Pickup bearing Registration No. AS19AC/0837 coming from West
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.70104 of 2021(2) dt.24-05-2022 2/2 Bengal, Dalkol. As they approached the vehicle, two persons tried to escape but were apprehended but only after good chase. Upon search, amongst other, altogether 185.230 k.g. of 'ganja' was recovered/seized.
Considering the gravity of the allegation that has been levelled against the two petitioners and the fact that 185.230 k.g. of 'ganja' has been recovered/seized, this Court is not inclined to grant any relief to the petitioners.
The bail application of the petitioners is hereby rejected.
(Rajiv Roy, J) Jagdish/- U T