Md. Obaidur Rahman @ Obaidur Rehman And ORS. v. State Of Bihar And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.16698 of 2015 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-72 Year-2014 Thana- SULTANGANJ District- Patna ====================================================== 1.

Md. Obaidur Rahman @ Obaidur Rehman son of Md. Khalilur Rahman 2.

Md. Soaibur Rahman @ Gudu son of Md. Khalilur Rahman 3.

Humaira Khatoon, wife of Md. Khalilur Rahman 4.

Md. Khalilur Rahman @ Khalilur Rahman son of Late Maulvi Abdul Rasheed All residents of Khuskibagh, P.S -Sadar, Purnea and District- Purnea 5.

Abeda Noorejahan @ Abeda, wife of Shakeel Ahmad and Daughter of Md. Khalilur Rahman 6.

Shakeel Ahmad, son of Md. Ayesh Ali Both residents of Mohalla-Firdaus- Nagar, Maitola, P.O and P.S- Duranda District- Ranchi.

7.

Aaleya Nurus Sabah @ Aleya, wife of Akhtar Alam and daughter of Md. Khalilur Rahaman 8.

Akhtar Alam, son of Haji Sanaullah Both residents of Village, P.S and P.O. - Harda and District- Purnea. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Rafat Jahan, Daughter of S.M. Indad Hasan, resident of Mohalla-Dargah, Shah Arjan , Main Gate, P.S - Sultanganj and District- Patna ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Mohammed Abu Haidar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Uday Pratap Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 15-05-2019 Heard the learned counsel for the parties.

The petitioners have challenged the order 02.03.2015 passed by learned Judicial Magistrate, Patna City in Sultanganj P.S. Case No. 72 of 2014 whereby cognizance has been taken against the petitioners under

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16698 of 2015(3) dt.15-05-2019 2/2 Sections 498(A)/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3 /4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

Since the charges have already been framed in this case, this Court is not inclined to interfere with the order of cognizance. It would be open for the petitioners either to singly or jointly with O.P. No. 2, approach the Court for sending the matter for mediation. If mediation is not possible, the trial ought to proceed and the Trial Court would see to it that the same is concluded as early as possible without any delay.

With the aforesaid observation, the petition stands disposed off.

(Ashutosh Kumar, J) Shageer/- U T