Shankar Dayal Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.56081 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-87 Year-2019 Thana- FALKA District- Katihar ====================================================== Shankar Dayal Singh, S/o Yogendra Narayan Singh, R/o Itahari, P.S.- Falka, District- Katihar ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sanjeev Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Dilip Kumar No.1, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 26-09-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioner is in custody on his remand since 29.06.2019 in connection with Falka P.S. Case No.87 of 2019 registered for the offence under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that initially, the petitioner was taken into custody on 07.04.2019 in Falka P.S. Case No.111 of 2019 and has been subsequently remanded in two other cases, including the present case. Learned counsel further submits that till date, there has been no T.I. Parade and also no recovery from his possession. It is further submitted that it is only on his self-confessional statement made before the police, which has no evidentiary

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.56081 of 2019(2) dt.26-09-2019 2/2 value, that the petitioner is being prosecuted in connection with the present case.

Considering the aforementioned facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Katihar, in connection with Falka P.S. Case No.87 of 2019, subject to the following conditions:

(1) One of the bailors will be the father of the petitioner.

(2) The petitioner shall not indulge himself in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

(3) The petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of his failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, his bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned court concerned.

(4) The petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail. (Anjana Mishra, J) PNM U T