Patna High CourtCR. MISC./60804/2025bail rejected

Ramesh Rai v. The State Of Bihar

2025-11-28Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.60804 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-739 Year-2024 Thana- AHIYAPUR District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== Ramesh Rai S/o- Chandeshwar Rai Village- Mustafapur Ps- Ahiyapur, DistMuzaffarpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Alok Kumar Alok, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Parmanand Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 28-11-2025 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned APP appearing on behalf of the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 307, 302, 447, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per prosecution case, it is alleged that all 7 F.I.R. named accused persons, including this petitioner, along with two unknown persons, abused and assaulted husband of informant. It is further alleged that when son of informant came to save him, he was also assaulted due to which, during course of treatment, son of informant died.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.60804 of 2025(2) dt.28-11-2025 2/2 committed no offence. Allegation of assault is general and omnibus and no specific accusation of overt act has been alleged against this petitioner. Petitioner claims clean antecedents.

5. On the other hand, learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner and submitted that petitioner is named in the F.I.R. with specific accusation that he, along with other F.I.R. named accused persons and two unknown persons, assaulted husband and son of informant due to which, during course of treatment, son of informant died.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, fact that petitioner is one of the assailant of the deceased and gravity of offence, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner is rejected.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U T