← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./61179/2023allowed

Ved Bhushan Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2024-03-05Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.61179 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-106 Year-2022 Thana- DHANGAI District- Bhojpur ====================================================== 1.

VED BHUSHAN SINGH SON OF KASHI NATH SINGH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE - UTARDAHA, P.S. - TIAR, DISTRICT - BHOJPUR, PRESENT AT JAGDEO NAGAR, P.S. - NAWADA, DISTRICT - BHOJPUR 2.

PUSHPANJALI SINGH WIFE OF VED BHUSHAN SINGH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE - UTARDAHA, P.S. - TIAR, DISTRICT - BHOJPUR, PRESENT AT JAGDEO NAGAR, P.S. - NAWADA, DISTRICT - BHOJPUR 3.

S.N. SINGH (SHIV NARAYAN SINGH) SON OF LATE SURY SINGH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE - HART POKHAR, P.S. - PIRO, DISTRICT - BHOJPUR ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Anil Kumar Choudhary For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Umeshanand Pandit ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 05-03-2024 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 379/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The petitioners are said to have entered in Radha Charan Singh Educational Society and Charitable Trust Global School of Education 10+2 and misguided the guard and teachers of the school and took away computer set printer, 10 piece laptop, deed of trust, proceeding register and several other

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.61179 of 2023(4) dt.05-03-2024 2/3 articles and loaded them on a pick up van and fled away.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioners are quite innocent and have committed no offence. They have been falsely implicated in this case. No such occurrence, in the manner as alleged, has ever taken place. Petitioner no.1 and 2 and the informant are own family members and there is a dispute regarding the school in question between the parties. He further submits that the petitioner no.1 is retired person from Air Force, Government of India and petitioner no.2 is his wife. He further submits that the petitioner no.1 and 2 are running the said school till date. Petitioners have no criminal antecedent, which is also mentioned in para-3 of the bail application.

5. Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.

6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case as this is a case of civil dispute between the parties, let the above named petitioners, be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.61179 of 2023(4) dt.05-03-2024 3/3 court below where the case is pending/Successor Court in connection with Danagali P.S. Case No.106 of 2022, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) shikha/- U T