Pinki Devi v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Review No.212 of 2016 ====================================================== Rita Devi, wife of Md. Ali, resident of Village West Purnvas Jalai, PSMahishi (OP Jalai), District- Saharsa. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
2. The Principal Secretary, Department of Panchayati Raj, Government of Bihar, Patna.
3. The District Magistrate cum District Election Officer, Saharsa, DistrictSaharsa.
4. The Assistant District Election Officer, Saharsa, District- Saharsa.
5. The Block Development Officer, Mahishi cum Block Election Officer, Saharsa, District- Saharsa.
6. The State Election Commission, Bihar through the State Election Commissioner.
..... Respondents ..... Opposite Parties.
7. Pinki Devi, wife of Shyam Paswan, resident of Jalai, PS- Mahishi (OP Jalai), Block Mahishi, District- Saharsa.
... Petitioner ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== with Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No. 2118 of 2016 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6747 of 2016 ====================================================== Pinki Devi, wife of Shyam Paswan, resident of Jalai, PS- Maheshi (OP- Jalai), Block- Maheshi, District- Saharsa.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar.
2.
Arbind Kumar Chaudhary, the Principal Secretary, Department of Panchayati Raj, Government of Bihar, Patna.
3.
Mr. Binod Singh Gunjiyal, the District Magistrate, Saharsa cum District Election Officer, Saharsa, District- Saharsa. 4.
Mr. Ranjan Kumar, the Assistant District Election Officer, Saharsa, District- Saharsa.
5.
Mr. Amit Kumar, the Block Development Officer, Maheshi cum Block Election Officer, Saharsa, District- Saharsa. 6.
The State Election Commission, Bihar through Mr. Ashok Kumar Chauhan, the State Election Commissioner, Bihar, Patna. 7.
Rita Devi, D/o Md. Ali @ Saima Khatoon, W/o Md. Ali, resident of Village- West Purnvas Jalai, PS- Maheshi (OP- Jalai), District- Saharsa. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
(In Civil Review No. 212 of 2016) For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. S.B.K. Manglam, Adv.
For the Opposite Party-State :
AC to GA-1 For the Opposite Party-SEC : Mr. Amit Shrivastava, Adv. Mr. Sanjeev Nikesh, Adv.
(In Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No. 2118 of 2016)
Patna High Court C. REV. No.212 of 2016(6) dt.23-01-2019 2/2 For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Subhash Kumar Jha For the Opposite Party :
AC to GA-1 For the Opposite Party-SEC : Mr. Amit Shrivastava, Adv. Mr. Sanjeev Nikesh, Adv.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN ORAL ORDER 23-01-2019 Re: Civil Review No.212 of 2016:
Learned counsel for the parties are present.
As prayed by Mr. S.B.K. Manglam, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this civil review application is dismissed as withdrawn.
Re: MJC No.2118 of 2016:
In view of Annexure 'A' to the show cause nothing survives.
The contempt application is disposed of accordingly. (Jyoti Saran, J) skpathak/- U