Umesh Kumar Pandit v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.64204 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-994 Year-2018 Thana- BEGUSARAI COMPLAINT CASE District- Begusarai ====================================================== 1.

Umesh Kumar Pandit, Son of Yogendra Pandit Resident of Village - Chhitwara, P.S.- Mahua, Distt - Vaishali. Presently resident of A.G. Coloney ward no. 5, P.S.- Rajeevnagar, Distt - Patna. 2.

Sita Devi Wife of Umesh Kumar Pandit Resident of Village - Chhitwara, P.S.- Mahua, Distt - Vaishali. Presently resident of A.G. Coloney ward no. 5, P.S.- Rajeevnagar, Distt - Patna.

3.

Chandan Kumar Son of Umesh Kumar Pandit Resident of Village - Chhitwara, P.S.- Mahua, Distt - Vaishali. Presently resident of A.G. Coloney ward no. 5, P.S.- Rajeevnagar, Distt - Patna. 4.

Puja Kumari D/o Umesh Kumar Pandit Resident of Village - Chhitwara, P.S.- Mahua, Distt - Vaishali. Presently resident of A.G. Coloney ward no. 5, P.S.- Rajeevnagar, Distt - Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

THE STATE OF BIHAR 2.

Nitu Kumari D/o Arjun Pandit, Wife of Kundan Kumar Resident of Village - Sikandarpur Rajaura, P.S.- Muffasil, Distt - Begusarai. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Usha Kumari Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Md. Fahimuddin ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 22-10-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Complaint Case No. 994 (C) of 2018, registered under Section 498(A)/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 4 of the D.P. Act.

The accusation is of torturing of the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.64204 of 2019(2) dt.22-10-2019 2/2 complainant/O.P. No.2 by her husband and other in-laws due to non-fulfillment of demand of dowry and removing her from matrimonial house along with her child snatching her personal belongings.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are father-in-law, mother-in-law, brother-in-law and sister-in-law of the complainant/O.P. No.2 and they have falsely been implicated in this case only to give undue pressure. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioners, be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the S.D.J.M. Begusarai in connection with Complaint Case No. 994 (C) of 2018, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438

(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) manish/- U T