← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/12747/2014dismissed

Kulwanti Devi v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2016-05-05Mr. Justice Ajay Kumar Tripathi2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12747 of 2014 ===========================================================

1. Kulwanti Devi W/o Late Ram Ashish Ram Resident of Village Raghopur, Post Office- Patent, Police Station- Rani Talab Kunapa ( Bikram), District- Patna. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. The Principal Secretary Industries (Administration) Bihar, Patna.

3. The Deputy Director of Industries (Administration), Bihar.

4. The Managing Director, Bihar State Handloom, Power loom and Handicraft Development Corporation, Patna.

5. The Regional Employees Provident Fund Commissioner, Patna.

6. The Director Hastakargha and Resham Nedeshalay, Patna.

7. The Accountant General, Bihar, Patna.

.... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sandip Singh For the Respondents : Mr. R.S.Pradhan, Sr. Advocate Mr Jainendra Kumar Mr AC to AAG 13 Mr Kumar Priya Ranjan =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 05-05-2016 Writ is required to be dismissed because the maximum pension which could be made available under the Employees Provident Fund has been sanctioned and is being paid. The husband of the petitioner was not a government servant but an employee of the Corporation where contributory provident fund was in vogue. There is a set formula statutory in nature based on which the calculation for minimum pension is worked out under the Employees Provident Fund and prayer of the petitioner that a calculation chart should be provided to her may not be acceded to

Patna High Court CWJC No.12747 of 2014 dt.05-05-2016 2/2 because that calculation can be done by any layman by looking at the formula based on which such calculation is done. If the petitioner is not satisfied, let her invoke the powers under Right to Information Act instead of wasting judicial time on such litigation. Writ is dismissed.

(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J) sk AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE Uploading Date 5.5.2016 Transmission Date