← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/13730/2024disposed

Ram Nandan Ram v. The State Of Bihar

2024-09-21Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13730 of 2024 ====================================================== Ram Nandan Ram S/o Late Ram Jag Ram, resident of village - Siserta, P.S. Nokha, District - Rohtas at Sasaram.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the District Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram. 2.

The District Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram.

3.

The Additional Collector, Sasaram, Rohtas.

4.

The Circle Officer, Nokha, Rohtas.

5.

The Officer Incharge, Nokha Police Station, Rohtas. 6.

The Superintendent of Police, Rohtas at Sasaram. 7.

Pradeep Kumar, S/o Late Bhikhari Dhobi, Resident of village - Siserta, P.S. Nokha, District - Rohtas at Sasaram.

8.

Shyam Sundar Ram, S/o Late Bhikhari Dhobi, Resident of village - Siserta, P.S. Nokha, District - Rohtas at Sasaram.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Vikalp, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Government Pleader- 7 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 21-09-2024 The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following reliefs:- "1. i. For a direction to the concerned authority to take appropriate action for vacating the property of the petitioner which has been encroached by respondents no.7 and 8 ii. For a direction to the respondent to save the life of the petitioner who is a senior citizen of this country and also a retired person.

iii. For a direction to the concerned

Patna High Court CWJC No.13730 of 2024(2) dt.21-09-2024 2/2 authority to lodge F.I.R. and make proper investigation and arrest respondents no. 7 and 8, in accordance with law.

iv. For a direction to respondents no.7 and to pay compensation.

v. For a direction to the concerned authority to give protection to the petitioner from respondents no. 7 and 8."

2.

At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks not to press the present writ petition, however, seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to avail such other alternative remedies as are otherwise available under the law, including that of filing civil suit before the Ld. Civil Court having competent jurisdiction, for redressal of the aforesaid grievances. Liberty, so sought, is granted.

3.

The writ petition stands disposed off.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) S.Sb/- U