Patna High CourtCR. MISC./59937/2025bail granted

Anukesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2025-09-03Mr. Justice Chandra Prakash Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.59937 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-224 Year-2025 Thana- BAISI District- Purnia ====================================================== Anukesh Kumar S/o- Raj Kumar R/o- Soura Jabar Ps- Baisi District- Purnea ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar 2.

Md. Sakib S/o- Bhado R/o- Jabar, W/ No- 9, Ps- Baisi District- Purnea ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ram Prawesh Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Umanath Mishra ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 03-09-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Baisi P.S. Case No. 224/2025 dated 10.06.2025 registered for the offences punishable u/ss 137, 96, 352, 351 read with section 3(5) of the BNS and section 8/12 of the POCSO Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner and the co-accused person are alleged to have kidnapped the minor sister of the informant and took her to their house. When the informant and the villagers went to their house to inquire, the accused persons threatened to kill them by waving the pistol in the air.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.59937 of 2025(2) dt.03-09-2025 2/2

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. There was love affair between the petitioner and the victim girl. The victim in her statement recorded u/s 183 of the BNSS has not supported the prosecution case and also she has not made any allegation against the petitioner. The petitioner has clean antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 11.06.2025.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Purnea in connection with Baisi P.S. Case No. 224/2025.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) guddukr/- U T