Abbas Ansari v. State Of Bihar And ANR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.32120 of 2014 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -2905 Year- 2012 Thana -GOPALGANJ COMPLAINT CASE DistrictGOPALGANJ ======================================================
1. Abbas Ansari son of Rasul Ansari resident of village - Bhoptapur, P.S. Kuchaykot, Distt. - Gopalganj .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar
2. Shajra Khatoon wife of Abbas Abbas Ansari, Daughter of Late Hafij Nijamuddin Ansari resident of village - Bhoptapur, P.S. Kuchaykot, Distt. - Gopalganj, at Present Resident of village - Shemra, P.S. Gopalganj, Distt. - Gopalganj .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pankaj Kumar Dubey, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Vinod Shankar Modi (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ORAL ORDER 13-04-2015 The petitioner figured as accused in Complaint Case No.2905/12, Trial No.4566/13, registered on the basis of a complaint submitted by the wife of the petitioner alleging offences including one punishable under Section-498A of I.P.C. Apprehending arrest, the petitioner filed A.B.P. No.1632/2013 in the court of learned Sessions Judge, Gopalganj. The learned Judge rejected the application through order dated 24.4.2014.
Hence, this application for grant of anticipatory bail under Section-438 of Cr.P.C. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
Whether one goes by the nature of allegations
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.32120 of 2014 (3) dt.13-04-2015 2/2 or the law laid down by the Supreme Court in the recent past, the arrest of a person who figured as accused in a case wherein offences punishable under Section-498A of I.P.C. is alleged, is not at all warranted.
Therefore, the application is allowed.
In the event of arrest, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail upon furnishing the bailbond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) along with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of S.D.J.M., Gopalganj, in connection with Complaint Case No.2905/12, Trial No.4566/13, subject to the conditions that:- (a) if any arrangement has been ordered by this Court on earlier occasion, it shall be in force till the disposal of the case before the trial court;
(b) the petitioner shall be under obligation to live with and maintain his wife, if she is otherwise willing; and (c) disposal of this application shall be without prejudice to the proceedings for mediation, if any. (L. Narasimha Reddy,CJ) K.C.jha/- U T