Patna High CourtCR. MISC./55509/2019bail granted

Satyaman Kumar @ Satyawan Das v. The State Of Bihar

2019-09-05Mr. Justice Birendra Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.55509 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-71 Year-2018 Thana- ANTI District- Gaya ====================================================== SATYAMAN KUMAR @ SATYAWAN DAS S/o Late Shyamdev Das R/o village- Murgiabigha, P.S.- Salaiya, District- Aurangabad (Bihar) ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Ms.Shally Kumari, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Pranav Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 05-09-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

The petitioner is languishing in custody for the offence punishable under Section 366A of the Indian Penal Code.

The statement of the two victim girls recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C. would reveal that both had gone to market and in the market a relation Khushbu Kumari telephoned them to come to Gaya. Thereafter, both went to Gaya on a bus. At the Gaya railway station, one Rohit took them to Haryana on train. At Haryana the petitioner received them at railway station Jamuna Nagar. Thereafter, both the sisters started job in a Mall. After eight days said Khushbu Kumari returned back to her house. Thereafter, the petitioner allegedly physically exploited both the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.55509 of 2019(2) dt.05-09-2019 2/2 sisters.

Submission is that the petitioner is a distant relation of the victim girls. They had voluntarily gone to Haryana without giving information to anyone as disclosed in the FIR. Due to some other dispute and just to pressurize false allegation has been labeled.

Considering the aforesaid submission, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court-below where the case is pending in connection with Anti P.S. Case No.71 of 2018, with following conditions:

(a) Both the bailors shall be the resident of territorial jurisdiction of the learned Court-below.

(b) The petitioner shall fully cooperate with the trial of the case, failing which the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner.

(Birendra Kumar, J) Mkr./- U T