Patna High CourtCR. WJC/794/2014dismissed

Satish Kumar And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2015-03-11Mr. Justice Ashwani Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.794 of 2014 Arising Out of PS.Case No. 162 Year- 2014 Thana -Kaji Mohammadpur District- MUZAFFARPUR ===========================================================

1. Satish Kumar, Son of late Nand Prasad .

2. Sunita Kumari, wife of Satish Kumar .

Both are residents of Mohalla - Chitrakut Nagar, Road No.5 Bibiganj . P.S.Sadar, District - Muzaffarpur .

3. Prabhat Kumar Srivastava ,Son of Late Braj Nndan Prasad .

4. Asha Kumari, wife of Prabhat Kumar Srivastava . Both are residents of Mohalla Chandmari P.S. Town Motihari Town , District - East Champaran at Motihari .

5. Sudhir Kumar, son of Late Nand Prasad .

6. Mira Srivastava @ Mira Devi, wife of Sudhir Kumar . Both are residents of village/ Mohalla-Shantipuri Station Road, P.S. Motihari Town, District -East Champaran Motihari .

7. Mantosh Kumar, Son of Late Nand Prasad , resident of Mohalla - Mahatma Gandhi Nagar Factory , Road , P.S. Agam Kuan . District- Patna. .... Petitioners

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. The Director General of Police, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

3. Superintendent of Police, Distt. Muzaffarpur.

4. Dy. Superintendent of Police, Distt. Muzaffarpur.

5. Sri Bela Nand Mishra , S.H.O. Kazi Mohmadpur , P.S. District Muzaffapur

6. Sri Umesh Mishra , S.I . Kazi Mohmadpur . P.S. District Muzaffapur . .... Respondents =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Arun Kumar, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Bandana Singh, A.C. to S.C.-25 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 11-03-2015 In this application filed under Articles 226 and 227 of

Patna High Court Cr. WJC No.794 of 2014 dt.11-03-2015 the Constitution of India, several disputed questions of fact have been raised, which cannot be adjudicated in writ jurisdiction. Accordingly, the application is dismissed.

(Ashwani Kumar Singh, J.) Vats/- U T