Jitendra Singh @ Ghuran Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.65886 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-65 Year-2024 Thana- RISIYAP District- Aurangabad ====================================================== 1.

Jitendra Singh @ Ghuran Singh S/o- Late Suryadeo Singh Village- Karaiya, P.S.- Risiup, District- Aurangabad 2.

Vijay Singh @ Vijmal Singh Son of Late Suryadeo Singh Village- Karaiya, P.S.- Risiup, District- Aurangabad 3.

Vikesh Singh @ Rinku Singh Son of Late Gandhi Singh Village- Karaiya, P.S.- Risiup, District- Aurangabad 4.

Manish Kumar Singh @ Manish Singh Son of Baijnath singh VillageKaraiya, P.S.- Risiup, District- Aurangabad 5.

Amit Singh @ Babu Singh @ Amit Kumar Son of Ram Dhyan Singh Village- Karaiya, P.S.- Risiup, District- Aurangabad ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Anil Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/ :

Mr. Harendra Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 01-10-2024 Heard the parties.

2.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 307, 353, 332, 333, 427, 120(B), 504 of the IPC. 3.

As per the FIR, the allegation against the petitioners is that they pelted stones upon the police personnel and damaged their vehicles. It is alleged that four police personnel got injuries at the time of occurrence.

3.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioners are quite innocent and have committed no offence.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.65886 of 2024(2) dt.01-10-2024 2/2 They have been falsely implicated in this case. No such occurrence, in the manner as alleged, has ever taken place. The allegation levelled against the petitioners is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. There is no specific overt act against the petitioners. It is further submitted that the injuries sustained by the police personnel are of simple nature. Petitioners have no criminal antecedent.

5.

Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail. 6.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioners, be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/Successor Court in connection with Risiup P.S. Case No.65 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) shikha/- U T