Saurabh Kumar @ Saurabh Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.62004 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-401 Year-2021 Thana- PARSA District- Saran ====================================================== SAURABH KUMAR @ SAURABH SINGH Son of Akhilesh Kumar Singh @ Nalini Kumar Singh Resident of Village- Bheldi, P.S.- Bheld, DistrictSaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Nalin Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ganesh Prasad Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 09-02-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 392 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per prosecution case, the informant who works in Bharat Finance Company as Manager and on alleged date of occurrence, while he was coming, in the meantime, two unknown persons riding on motorcycle and snatched Rs. 83,000/- along with mobile phone from the informant. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has falsely been implicated in this case on the basis of suspicion.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.62004 of 2022(2) dt.09-02-2023 2/2 Neither the petitioner named in FIR nor any incriminating article has been recovered from his conscious which shows his complicity in this offence. The petitioner has been remanded in this case from another case of Bheldi P.S. Case No. 65 of 2022 on his self confessional statement, which has got no evidentiary value in the eye of law. it is further submitted that the petitioner has not been put on TIP till date. The petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 11.4.2022.

Learned APP appearing for the state has opposed the prayer of regular bail.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with Parsa P.S. Case No. 401 of 2021 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M.,-IXth, Saran at Chapra.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) amandeep/- U T