Patna High CourtCR. MISC./33941/2014disposed

Singheshwar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2015-03-27Mr. Justice Dinesh Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.33941 of 2014 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -22 Year- 2014 Thana -MAHNAR District- VAISHALI(HAJIPUR) ====================================================== Singheshwar Singh .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Smt. Anuradha Singh, Advocate. For the Opposite Party : Mr. Ajay Kr. 2(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 27-03-2015 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 353, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. It is alleged that the informant was abused and threatened through mobile of the petitioner. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the SIM of alleged mobile was registered in the name of brother of the petitioner, statements to that effect have been made in paragraph nos. 8 and 9 of the petition. A statement has been made in paragraph no. 3 of the petition that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail in the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.33941 of 2014 (2) dt.27-03-2015 2 / 2 event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with Mahnar P.S. Case No. 22 of 2014 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M. Vaishali at Hajipur, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

The bail bond of the petitioner will be accepted by the learned court below on verification of the fact that SIM of alleged mobile was registered in the name of brother of the petitioner. U.K./- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J) U T