← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/16623/2022disposed

Ramjee Prasad Sinha v. The State Of Bihar

2024-04-05Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16623 of 2022 ====================================================== 1.

Ramjee Prasad Sinha Son of Bishundeo Prasad, Resident of MohallaNarayani Nagar, Sanchipatti, P.S.-Hajipur Town, Dist.-Vaishali. 2.

Kailash Prasad Singh, Son of Maksudan Singh, Resident of VillageJagdamba Asthan, Bagmali, P.S.-Hajipur, Dist.-Vaishali. 3.

Amarnath Dubey, son of Jagdish Dubey, Resident of Village-Rambhadra, Nichali Mor, P.S.-Hajipur Town, Dist.-Vaishali. 4.

Akhileshwar Prasad Singh, son of Baldev Singh, Resident of S.D.O. Road Hajipur, P.S.-Hajipur, Dist.-Vaishali.

5.

Raghunath Rajak, son of Jangali Rajak, Resident of Village-Malichak, P.S.- Sonepur, Dist.-Saran.

6.

Shankar Prasad Sinha, son of Bishundev Prasad Sinha, Resident of VillageBagmali, P.S.-Hajipur Town, Dist.-Vaishali. 7.

Awadhesh Pandey, son of Late Raghunath Pandey, Resident of VillageChandralaya, P.S.-Hajipur Sadar, Dist.-Vaishali. 8.

Sayed Fahimuddin, son of Sayed Naimuddin, Resident of VillageMiyanbagh, P.S.-Sonepur, Dist.-Saran. 9.

Arjun Sharma, son of Jaddu Sharma, Resident of Village-Hathsarganj, P.S.- Hajipur Town, Dist.-Vaishali.

10.

Amin Mandal, son of Adhiklal Mandal, Resident of Village-S.D.O. Road Hajipur, P.S.-Hajipur Town, Dist.-Vaishali.

11.

Birendra Kumar, son of Dev Narayan Mandal, Resident of Village-3/335 Budha Colony Hajipur, P.S.-Hajipur, Dist.-Vaishali. 12.

Minarik Paswan, son of Rampat Paswan, Resident of Village-Pandriwa Bauli, P.S.-Hajipur Town, Dist.-Vaishali.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar represented through the Principal Secretary, Finance Dept, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Principal Secretary, Finance Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 3.

The High Court of Judicature at Patna through the Registrar General, Patna. 4.

The Registrar, Civil Court Vaishali at Hajipur. 5.

Treasury Officer, Vaishali at Hajipur.

6.

District and Sessions Judge, Vaishali at Hajipur. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Anil Kumar, Adv.

For the State :

Mr.Sarvesh Kumar (GP-24) For the PHC :

Mr.Satyabir Bharti, Adv.

Mr.Abhishek Anand, Adv.

Ms.Kanupriya, Adv.

======================================================

Patna High Court CWJC No.16623 of 2022(2) dt.05-04-2024 2/3 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 05-04-2024

1. At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to add District and Sessions Judge, Vaishali at Hajipur, as party respondent no.6, to the present writ petition. Permission so sought is granted.

2. Let the needful be done during the course of the day.

3. The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following relief(s):- "1. That this is an application for issuance of an appropriate writ(s), order(s), direction to pay the scale of Rs. 2610-4000 or Rs. 2650-4000 to the petitioners as per their basic pay as on 31.12.1995 and according revise the pay/pension since 01.01.1996 and grant financial benefit to the petitioners accordingly and pay the arrears of pay/pension and current pension in the revised scale in view of resolution dated 23.09.2016 and 15.12.2016 of Finance Department, government of Bihar and in compliance of order dated 25.01.2021 issued by the District and Session Judge, Vaishali and grant benefit of A.C.P./M.A.C.P. in the said scale."

4. At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioners seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioners to approach the District

Patna High Court CWJC No.16623 of 2022(2) dt.05-04-2024 3/3 and Sessions Judge, Vaishali at Hajipur, for redressal of their aforesaid grievances. Liberty so sought is granted.

5. It is needless to state that in case appropriate representation is filed by the petitioners, before the District and Sessions Judge, Vaishali at Hajipur, within a period of two weeks from today, the same shall be considered, in accordance with law and a reasoned and a speaking order shall be passed, thereon, within a period of six weeks, thereafter.

6. The writ petition stands disposed off on the aforesaid terms.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) sonal/- U