← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./35171/2013dismissed

Brajesh Kishore Sharan And ANR v. State Of Bihar And ANR

2017-01-16Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.35171 of 2013 (3) dt.16-01-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.35171 of 2013 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -1748 Year- 2009 Thana -EAST CHAMPARAN COMPLAINT District- EASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI) ======================================================

1. Brajesh Kishore Sharan S/O Late Sita Kishore Sharan Resident Of B/4, Officer'S Flat, Road No. 2, New Punaichak, P.S- Shastri Nagar, DistrictPatna (Town)

2. Shashi Rani Sharan W/O Brajesh Kishore Sharan Resident Of B/4, Officer'S Flat, Road No. 2, New Punaichak, P.S- Shastri Nagar, DistrictPatna (Town) .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar

2. Smita Verma D/O Sri Ambrish Kumar Verma Resident Of Lala Tola Agarwa, P.S- Motihari Sadar, District- East Champaran. .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sunil Kumar-Ii For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ramchandra Singh (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 16-01-2017 Nobody appears on behalf of the petitioners in this case in spite of the fact that for the last several days, the case is being listed.

From perusal of the record, it appears that this application has been filed for quashing order dated 22.07.2013 passed in Trial No.2284 of 2013 arising out of Complaint Case No.C-1748 of 2009, by which the learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sadar, Motihari has framed charges against the petitioners under Section 498(A)/34, 323/34, 379/34, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code and the aforesaid order framing charges is under challenge

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.35171 of 2013 (3) dt.16-01-2017 before this Court.

As stated above, nobody appears on behalf of the petitioners.

From perusal of the complaint petition as well as order framing charges, it appears that there is no infirmity in the order. As such, this application is dismissed.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U