Bijendra Yadav @ Vijendra Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.58512 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-104 Year-2024 Thana- SALAKHUA District- Saharsa ====================================================== Bijendra Yadav @ Vijendra Yadav Son of Vindeshwari Yadav @ Late Bindeshwari Yadav R/O Vill- Balchan Tola, P.S.- Salkhua, District- Saharsa. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Harish Chandra Patel, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ramchandra Sahni, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 17-10-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. Petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with ST No. 200 of 2025, arising out of Salkhua P.S. Case No. 104 of 2024 in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 328, 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per prosecution story, on account of family dispute this petitioner along with other FIR named accused persons assaulted the mother of informant and administered her poison as a result of which, the mother of informant died.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. Petitioner is own uncle of informant and due to property dispute he has falsely been implicated in the present case. Informant is not an

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.58512 of 2025(2) dt.17-10-2025 2/2 eyewitness to the alleged occurrence and informant has not disclosed in the FIR as to how he came to know about the participation of the petitioner in the present occurrence. Suspicion has only been raised against this petitioner because of property dispute. Petitioner is in custody since 03.03.2025, claims clean antecedent and chargesheet has already been submitted in the present case.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposes the bail application.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and period of custody, the bail application is allowed. Let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned District & Additional Sessions JudgeII, Saharsa, in connection with Salkhua P. S. Case No. 104 of 2024.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Shahnawaz/- U T