Meena Devi v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.61083 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-341 Year-2018 Thana- BALIYA District- Begusarai ====================================================== Meena Devi aged about 39 years (female) W/O Dhrub Sah, Resident of Village - Tulsi Tol, P.S.- Ballia, District - Begusarai. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Chandan Kumar Kashyap, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Kalyan Shankar, APP.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 26-09-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State.
The petitioner apprehends her arrest in connection with Ballia P.S. Case No. 341 of 2018 registered under section 366(A)/34 of the I.P.C.
The allegation against the petitioner, as per the first information report, is that the daughter of the informant was abducted by Anil Sah and two others and when the informant went to the house of Anil Sah, the petitioner being the mother of Anil Sah abused the informant.
Mr. Ranjan Kumar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that from perusal of the first information report, it would be evident that the daughter of the informant was abducted by Anil Sah, who is son of the petitioner and the only allegation against the petitioner is that when the informant
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.61083 of 2019(2) dt.26-09-2019 2/2 arrived at the house of the petitioner to make a complaint, the informant was abused by the petitioner. Learned counsel relying upon Annexure-2, which is the statement of the victim girl recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C submits that the victim girl has not stated anything against the petitioner and whatever has been stated by her the same has been stated against Anil Sah. Having regard the submission made by the parties and taking into consideration the fact that the victim girl has not said anything against the petitioner in her statement recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
Accordingly, the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks from today shall be released on anticipatory bail by the Court below upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Begusarai in connection with Ballia P.S. Case No. 341 of 2018, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. (Anil Kumar Sinha, J) Anjula/- U